Model & approach
- Model gas flow and particle trajectories together inside the separator chamber
- Compare geometry variants for discharge, carry-over, dead zones and flow resistance
Project case / Customer-independent
CFD design of a spark pre-separator
Gas-particle CFD compared chamber and guide variants intended to divert hot or coarse particles away from the main stream before downstream equipment.
Engineering question
Separation had to improve without burdening the process-gas path with excessive recirculation or pressure loss.
Boundary conditions
- Particle-laden process gas with gravity- and inertia-driven separation
- Several chamber and guide-element variants
Results of the assessment
- Particle inertia and local turning governed which paths reached the discharge region.
- The variants exposed a clear trade-off between separation, carry-over and added resistance.
Engineering consequence
The CFD assessment supported selection of a pre-separator geometry for subsequent plant design.
Context
This page summarizes internal project documentation independently of the customer. Absolute values, confidential geometry and independent physical validation are not published.
Related projects
Process & plant engineeringCFD simulation
Shape optimization of a flow bend
CFD and adjoint optimization were used to develop a compact flow turn within defined packaging constraints.
View project
Process & plant engineeringCFD simulation
Separator baffles in a pipe reactor
CFD assessed the form and orientation of separator baffles whose movement through pipe bends could impair stable operation.
View project
Process & plant engineeringFEA structural analysis
Cooling-assembly structure
A finite-element model assessed the assembly, welded joints and support reactions across operating, exceptional and vibration load families.
View projectA similar question?